Rough and direct live sets are more enjoyable

There is an interesting difference between the computer music presenter and a live act. While the centered tape operator has perfect conditions for creating the best possible sound, for presenting a finished work in the most brilliant way (which might occasionally even include virtuoso mixing desk science rather than static adjustment to match room acoustics), the live act has to fight with situations which are far from perfect and at the same time is expected to be more lively. Given these conditions, it is no wonder that generally rough and direct live sets are more enjoyable, while the attempt to reproduce complex studio works on a stage seem more likely to fail.

A rough sounding performance simply seems to match so much more the visual information we get when watching a guy behind a laptop. Even if we have no clue about their work, there is a vague idea of how much complexity a single person can handle. The more the actions result in an effect like a screaming lead guitar, the more we feel that it is live. If we experience more detail and perfection we most likely will suspect we are listening to pre-prepared music. And most of the time we are right with this assumption.

From “Live Performance in the Age of Supercomputing” by Robert Henke

Why draw a line between audience and artist?

Da un’intervista a Burnt Friedman

Why would anyone want to perform behind the PA system? There is no reason for it since there are no microphones. When you have microphones, you have feedback issues. But an environment that’s solely set up for electronic equipment, you don’t have these problems, so why would you have people setting up behind the system? Then they are the only ones who are not hearing the sound properly. And why draw a line between audience and artist? To me it’s a rock music kind of thinking that you need someone to focus on, someone who’s more or less on the stage.

Do you often perform on the floor in front of the stage?

I always do it when possible, but more often when it’s just me alone. If it’s a band with drums, we need the stage because it’s something nice to look at. You get someone drumming in the right way and you see how it identifies with the rhythms, with the computer rhythms. It’s really nice to watch.

But with DJ equipment, and especially DJing without records, the performance can only be very poor onstage because nobody knows what’s going on. The stage is ideal for dance choreography, for theatre and for music as well, but if you can’t watch the music, if you don’t understand how they produce the music, the whole concept falls apart. If you play your tracks off the USB stick, which is technically logical and understandable because you have a much wider repertoire, and you are using CD players, I mean, there is no reason why you would perform a spontaneous mix out of fresh new tracks, it could easily be made up, especially in the environment where you have the responsibility for 2,000 people.

Do you think there’s reason to suspect those DJs?

I don’t suspect it, but you could say the situation suspects it. Imagine someone who’s not an insider, who doesn’t know about CD players, who doesn’t know about turntables—he would assume that it’s completely automatic. I’m always trying to look upon things from an outsider perspective, to get a more objective impression of what’s happening. Like an alien, extra-terrestrial point of view if you like. As far as possible, at least.

So when you’re playing and people can’t see what’s going on, that makes you uncomfortable?

Yeah, it makes me feel uncomfortable, absolutely. Ideally I would perform in an ensemble. Each sequence that is played back would be performed by someone and I would be playing my part as well. But you can imagine that this is almost impossible today.

Because I didn’t have a mixer

And I used to twist the cables together—I cut the ends off the cables and twisted them together to mix the sound of the keyboard with the sound of the drum machine, because I didn’t have a mixer. So I twisted them together and then just stuck them in the input of my mom and dad’s cassette recorder, their stereo. And I would record these tracks, and they’re only on one channel, they’re on the left, and yeah, we did put one of them out on Rephlex.

DMX Krew

Defunken setup: mixer Yamaha MG102C e casse Infrasonic Blow5

La settimana scorsa ho comprato un paio di casse / monitor di riferimento e un mixerino. Ne avevo bisogno: suonare attaccato allo stereo usando un vecchio mixer da radio non era molto sostenibile.

Le casse sono della Infrasonic, un marchio sudcoreano apparentemente sconosciuto. Il modello è chiamato Blow5 (probabilmente succhiano), sono attive (o “preamplificate”), con un woofer da 5 pollici. Dalle prime prove, probabilmente non avevo bisogno di casse più potenti, ma avrei commesso un errore se avessi scelto un modello più piccolo con coni da 4 o 3 pollici.

Ero sul punto di comprare un paio di Alesis, ma all’ascolto non mi sono piaciute perché molto cariche di bassi, mentre queste Infrasonic mi sono sembrate più equilibrate. Hanno il foro per l’uscita dell’aria posizionato frontalmente – a quanto pare, questo è preferibile in situazioni come la mia, dove le casse sono posizionate molto vicine alle pareti. Le ho pagate circa 230 euro. Per ora sono contento.

Il mixer è uno Yamaha MG102C ed è costato circa 120 euro. Ha 2 ingressi mono e 4 stereo, con mandate ausiliarie per gli effetti e altre uscite. Niente crossfader, solo rotary controls, probabilmente troppo vicini fra loro per le mie dita, ma per ora devo tenere a bada le mie pretese.

Felix’s Machines

“musical instruments as well as kinetic sculptures”

Quadraphonic electroacoustic experimental copyleft music: Modisti

Modisti netlabel is a independent netlabel dedicated to electroacoustic experimental music and sound art. This netlabel is interested in multi-channel works diffusion. So, we publish your quadraphonic or 5.1 works, including a multichannel streaming player and distribution in Ac3 format. Releases are available under creative commons license. We accept demos.
Modisti collabora anche con Laverna.net, una netlabel italiana che tratta musica libera elettronica.

Linee di basso, amplificatori e frequenze

You have to bear in mind that C2 lies at 65 Hz – lower than many smaller speakers reach – and that E2 is at a higher 82 Hz, which means a bass playing E2 will sound good on all kinds of speakers – in clubs, in bars – even home stereos. F2 (87Hz) will sound even better

da un’intervista a Olivier Giacomotto